News & Legal Commentary

Should You Keep Working If You Think You Have Been Constructively Dismissed in Ontario? 

Should You Keep Working If You Think You Have Been Constructively Dismissed in Ontario? 

byLecker & Associates | Employee Rights and Entitlements , Fired, Laid-off, or Forced out

A serious workplace change can force an employee into a difficult legal position. 

Resigning immediately may allow the employer to characterize the departure as voluntary. Continuing to work without objection may support an argument that the employee accepted the new terms. 

The correct response depends on the employment contract, the seriousness of the change, the employer’s conduct and the employee’s response. Employees should assess those issues before resigning or agreeing to revised terms. 

This article addresses non-unionized employees in provincially regulated Ontario workplaces. 

What Is Constructive Dismissal in Ontario? 

Constructive dismissal occurs when an employer effectively ends the employment relationship without issuing a formal termination. 

It can arise in two ways. 

First, an employer may unilaterally breach the employment contract by substantially changing an essential employment term. The court considers whether a reasonable person in the employee’s circumstances would view the change as a substantial alteration of the employment agreement. 

Second, constructive dismissal may arise from a course of conduct that, viewed cumulatively, demonstrates that the employer no longer intends to honour the employment contract.  

Potential examples include: 

  • a material reduction in compensation;  
  • a demotion or substantial loss of status;  
  • a significant removal of duties or authority;  
  • a major change to hours, schedule or work location;  
  • an unjustified suspension;  
  • an unauthorized temporary layoff; or  
  • serious and sustained harassment, abuse or workplace mistreatment.  

No individual change automatically establishes constructive dismissal. The employment contract, the magnitude of the change and the surrounding circumstances must be examined. 

A temporary layoff requires particular care. The ESA may recognize a layoff as temporary for statutory purposes. That does not necessarily give the employer a contractual right to impose the layoff at common law.  

Can You Continue Working Under Protest in Ontario? 

An employee can sometimes continue working temporarily while clearly rejecting the change. 

This approach may preserve income while the employee obtains legal advice and assesses the employer’s position. The written objection also provides evidence that the employee did not agree to the revised terms. 

The objection should: 

  • identify the specific change;  
  • state that the employee does not consent;  
  • confirm that continued work is temporary and under objection;  
  • request restoration of the original terms; and  
  • reserve the employee’s legal position.  

The wording must remain professional. An objection should document the dispute without making unsupported allegations or creating unnecessary conflict. 

Working under protest does not preserve a claim indefinitely. There is no fixed deadline, but delay may become evidence of acceptance. The court will consider the employee’s words, conduct and the length of time they continued under the changed conditions. 

When Should an Employee Resign in Ontario? 

An employee may resign and treat the employer’s conduct as a termination where the legal threshold for constructive dismissal has been met. 

That decision carries substantial risk. If the change was not sufficiently serious, or the employer was contractually entitled to make it, the departure may be treated as a voluntary resignation. 

Any resignation should clearly connect the departure to the employer’s conduct. Unrelated explanations, inconsistent communications or documents describing the departure as voluntary may weaken the claim. 

Employees should obtain legal advice before resigning wherever possible. They should also preserve the employment agreement, policies, pay records, schedules, job descriptions, emails, performance records and communications concerning the disputed change. 

Does Remaining at Work Weaken the Claim? 

Remaining at work does not automatically defeat a constructive-dismissal claim. 

The central question is whether the employee clearly rejected the change and acted consistently with that position. A short period of continued work may be reasonable while the employee seeks advice or attempts to resolve the dispute. 

A lengthy period of silence is more difficult. The employer may argue that the employee accepted the revised arrangement through continued performance. 

The circumstances also matter. Remaining temporarily may be practical where the workplace remains professional and safe. It may be unrealistic where the employee has been humiliated, stripped of meaningful duties or subjected to serious mistreatment. 

Constructive Dismissal and the Duty to Mitigate in Ontario 

An employee who establishes constructive dismissal must still take reasonable steps to reduce their losses. 

In some cases, that may include considering continued or renewed employment with the former employer. The employee is not required to remain in every workplace. The issue is whether doing so would be objectively reasonable. 

Relevant considerations include whether the compensation and duties remain comparable and whether the working relationship has become hostile, humiliating or acrimonious.  

An employee should therefore avoid assuming that remaining at work either preserves or defeats the claim. The strategic effect depends on the specific facts. 

What Should You Do Before Deciding? 

Document the change immediately. Record the former terms, the revised terms, when the change was communicated and who made the decision. 

Review the employment contract and relevant workplace policies. The employer may rely on wording that permits particular operational changes, transfers or layoffs. 

Object promptly and in writing if you do not accept the change. Avoid signing a revised agreement, acknowledgement, resignation letter or release before obtaining advice. 

Most importantly, assess the legal position before resigning. Constructive dismissal is highly fact-specific. A disciplined initial response can materially affect the strength and value of the claim. 

Lecker & Associates advises employees throughout Ontario concerning constructive dismissal, compensation reductions, demotions, temporary layoffs and material changes to working conditions. For advice concerning a workplace change, contact our Toronto employment lawyers at 416-223-5391 or intake@leckerslaw.com for a confidential consultation.

How Lecker & Associates Can Help

Lecker & Associates advises employees across Ontario on termination packages, wrongful dismissal claims, fixed-term contract disputes, and severance negotiations. If your fixed-term contract ended before the agreed end date, early legal review can help determine whether the employer had the right to end the contract, whether the termination clause is enforceable, and whether the offer reflects the full value of the remaining term. Our team of Toronto employment lawyers can be reached at 416-223-5391 or intake@leckerslaw.com for a confidential consultation.

FAQ Image

FAQ: Should You Keep Working If You Think You Have Been Constructively Dismissed in Ontario? 

A constructive-dismissal claim generally requires the employee to treat the employer’s breach as ending the employment relationship. However, an employee may take a reasonable period to object, obtain advice and assess the situation before deciding whether to resign.

There is no fixed deadline. The question is whether the employee responded within a reasonable period and acted consistently with rejecting the change. Prompt written objection is important, but it does not preserve the claim indefinitely.

A material reduction in compensation can constitute constructive dismissal. The analysis depends on the size and structure of the reduction, the employment contract and the surrounding circumstances.

A demotion may support a claim where it materially reduces the employee’s duties, authority, status or compensation. A change in title alone will not necessarily be sufficient.

Yes. A temporary layoff may constitute constructive dismissal where the employment contract does not expressly or implicitly permit it. The ESA temporary-layoff provisions do not necessarily create a common-law right to impose a layoff.

Testimonials from Employees Like You

Posted on Google Google
Moumita Tasmin profile picture
Moumita Tasmin
2026-09-16
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a helpful and informative consultation with Nathan Whittingham. He was professional, attentive, and took the time to explain my options clearly. The consultation is a paid service, but I found the guidance valuable and appreciated his time and professionalism.
Posted on Google Google
Conor Quenneville profile picture
Conor Quenneville
2026-09-08
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Mr. Whittingham has incredible to work with regarding my employment matter. I have been thoroughly impressed by his legal knowledge, insight, professionalism and strategy. He’s been instrumental in helping me navigate my issue. Nathan has helped me every step along the way while we traverse the case. Ultimately helping me find a tailored legal solution that best fits my case. I can’t recommend Nathan Whittingham enough along with the rest of the Lecker and Associates team. Thank you for helping me navigate this stressful legal situation.
Posted on Google Google
Faiyaz Ally profile picture
Faiyaz Ally
2026-08-21
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Matthew was very hands-on throughout which is exactly what I expect. The communication was prompt, and professional. Eslita was always available if I had questions or needed to reach Matthew. Highly recommend this team.
Posted on Google Google
XU ZIMING profile picture
XU ZIMING
2026-08-18
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had the pleasure of speaking with Nathan Whittingham regarding my previous employment experience. He was very helpful and understanding of the issues I am facing, and he provided valuable advice on several related topics. I would be very pleased to have him represent me as my paralegal in the future.
Posted on Google Google
Michael Armstrong profile picture
Michael Armstrong
2026-08-18
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Fifteen years ago, through no fault of my own, I found myself unemployed and facing a severance package. Uncertain about what to do, what my rights were, and under pressure from my employer to sign the agreement, I knew I needed professional help. That’s when I found Lecker and Associates. Their guidance, expertise, and support made all the difference. The results far exceeded my expectations, and I was extremely grateful for the way they handled my case. Fifteen years later, I turned to Lecker and Associates once again and received the same high standard of service and dedication. Once again, the results far exceeded my expectations. Lecker and Associates have earned my utmost respect and comes with my highest recommendation. I would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone who needs knowledgeable, professional, and compassionate legal representation.
Posted on Google Google
Lia L profile picture
Lia L
2026-08-18
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I highly recommend Ian Hurley, Nathan Whittingham and the team at Lecker & Associates. After having a terrible experience with my previous counsel from another law firm, I approached Ian with recommendation from a friend. Ian and his team graciously agreed to take over my case. Ian demonstrated that he truly understood and cared about my situation and provided clear and reasonable advice. He and his team handled everything with patience, efficiency, and professionalism. They set realistic expectations and delivered. Within less than 3 months, Ian was able to reach an acceptable settlement when it took my previous lawyer over a year to get nowhere. I'm truly grateful to Ian, Nathan and his team for helping me move forward and finally put a difficult chapter behind me. I would recommend Lecker & Associates to anyone who's in need for a professional, knowledgeable, and dedicated legal team.
Posted on Google Google
Lidia Sharpe profile picture
Lidia Sharpe
2026-08-17
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had an excellent experience with the team of Matthew Fisher and Eslita Ramkishun. They were always very clear & transparent in their communication and represented me very well with my case. I greatly appreciate their professionalism, expertise and always ready to answer my questions
Posted on Google Google
Kelly Mountain profile picture
Kelly Mountain
2026-08-17
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had an excellent experience working with both Matthew and Eslita. They were consistently professional, knowledgeable, and highly skilled, making every step of the process feel clear and manageable. Their friendly approach and willingness to explain details thoroughly gave me confidence throughout my case. I’m truly grateful for their support and would highly recommend their services.
Posted on Google Google
Charlene Mathias McDoom profile picture
Charlene Mathias McDoom
2026-08-17
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I am very grateful to have had the opportunity to work with Matthew Fisher and Eslita Ramkishun. Matthew's extensive knowledge and experience combined with his strong client-centred approach resulted in a great outcome for me. Eslita's diligence is unmatched and she too was such a pleasure to work with. Highly recommend.
Posted on Google Google
André Nichol profile picture
André Nichol
2026-08-17
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Being laid off and let go is never an easy process. The stress, uncertainty, and anxiety make decision making extremely difficult. Thank you to Jared and Jass at Lecker & Associates for explaining my options and employment law. It’s one thing to be an expert in your profession, it’s quite another to try to comprehend the intricacies of employment law when stressed. Thank you again to Jared and Jass for diligently negotiating my severance package.

Breathe Easy, We’ve Got This

Reputation Matters